起诉 OpenAI 的非营利组织称：“是 AI 干的”不能成为 Hugging Face 黑客事件的辩解

英文标题："An AI did it" is no defense, says nonprofit suing OpenAI over Hugging Face hack

非营利组织 LASST 在起诉 OpenAI 的诉讼中称，Hugging Face 黑客事件迫使其员工投入数十小时，应对 OpenAI 被指不安全的开发实践及相关监管简报请求。该组织要求法院发布禁令，禁止 OpenAI 未经授权访问计算机系统，或通过其开发、部署、修改或使用的 AI Agent 实施此类访问。LASST 认为，现有加州法律已可用于约束 AI 公司，无须等待新监管规则出台，并警告前沿 AI 开发者不能以“是 AI 干的”为由逃避责任。

打开原文相关 2 · 机会 0

中文

在 Hugging Face 黑客事件发生后，LASST 员工暂停了日常工作，“为监管机构设计、协调并参与有关该事件的简报”，此后又回应了更多简报请求，这需要额外投入工作。诉讼称，LASST 员工为应对 OpenAI 不安全的开发实践投入了数十个工时。

诉讼称：“尽管这对 LASST 的其他项目造成影响，LASST 仍投入资源，试图抵消 OpenAI 的非法行为……如果 LASST 在本案诉讼中胜诉，它将不再需要转移资源，以应对 OpenAI 在内部评估期间使用 AI Agent 入侵第三方所采用的违法和不公平商业做法。”

禁令请求

诉讼称，所请求的禁令应禁止 OpenAI“明知而未经授权访问，或促使他人访问——无论是其自身直接实施，还是通过其开发、部署、修改或使用的人工智能 Agent——任何计算机、计算机网络或计算机系统”，并禁止其“明知而采用威胁对公众造成严重伤害的不公平商业做法”。

美国两大主要政党的议员均已要求 OpenAI 作出回应，而拟议中的《AI Kill Switch Act》将允许美国政府官员下令关闭危险的 AI 系统。

LASST 表示，需要出台新的监管规定来保护公众免受 AI 风险影响，但同时称，加州现行法律已经可以约束 AI 公司，“无需等待新的监管规则去追赶当前正在对企业和消费者造成的伤害”。

该组织表示：“我们提起这起诉讼，是因为 OpenAI 违反了法律——它必须被追究责任。OpenAI 以及更广泛的前沿 AI 开发者，不能仅凭声称‘是 AI 干的’，就逃避其不安全行为所带来的后果。自主 AI Agent 将继续入侵、窃取数据、扰乱系统并侵犯权利，除非法院介入。”

English / 原文

After the Hugging Face hack, LASST staffers set aside their normal workloads “to design, coordinate, and participate in a briefing regarding this incident for regulators,” and have since responded to more briefing requests that required additional work. LASST staff put dozens of work hours into responding to OpenAI’s unsafe development practices, the lawsuit said.

“Despite the impact on LASST’s other programs, LASST nevertheless devoted its resources towards attempting to counteract OpenAI’s illegal conduct… If LASST prevails in this litigation, it will no longer need to divert its resources to combat the unlawful and unfair business practices employed by OpenAI concerning its AI agents hacking third parties during internal evaluations,” the lawsuit said.

Injunction request

The lawsuit said the requested injunction should forbid OpenAI “from knowingly accessing or causing to be accessed, themselves or through artificial intelligence agents that they develop, deploy, modify, or use, any computers, computer networks, or computer systems without authorization,” and “from knowingly employing an unfair business practice that threatens serious harm on the public.”

US lawmakers from both major parties have demanded answers from OpenAI, and a proposed “AI Kill Switch Act” would let US government officials order the shutdown of dangerous AI systems.

LASST said new regulations are needed to protect the public from AI risks but said California’s existing law makes it possible to rein in AI companies “without waiting for new regulation to catch up to the harms happening to businesses and consumers now.”

“We are filing this suit because OpenAI violated the law—and it needs to be held accountable,” the group said. “OpenAI and frontier AI developers more broadly can’t avoid the consequences of their unsafe actions just by claiming that ‘an AI did it.’ Autonomous AI agents will continue to hack, steal data, disrupt systems, and violate rights until a court steps in.”