community Reddit LocalLLaMA 2026-10-22T23:47 正文 thin 0 words

Qwen 3.8 Flash Next (129 GB) is better than 2.6 bpw DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (187 GB + 203 GB Engram)

英文标题:Qwen 3.8 Flash Next (129 GB) is better than 2.6 bpw DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (187 GB + 203 GB Engram)

I compared Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-W4A16-FP8PLE at xhigh reasoning vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-dsx-2.6bit (my own quant) at max reasoning by benchmarking using a modified version of BenchKit. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 2.6 bit scored 23/25, while Qwen scored 25/25 (full marks). This is just a small sample
打开原文相关 4 · 机会 0

中文

I compared Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-W4A16-FP8PLE at xhigh reasoning vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-dsx-2.6bit (my own quant) at max reasoning by benchmarking using a modified version of BenchKit. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 2.6 bit scored 23/25, while Qwen scored 25/25 (full marks). This is just a small sample

中文全文翻译正在补齐,可先查看下方英文原文。

English / 原文

I compared Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-W4A16-FP8PLE at xhigh reasoning vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-dsx-2.6bit (my own quant) at max reasoning by benchmarking using a modified version of BenchKit. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 2.6 bit scored 23/25, while Qwen scored 25/25 (full marks). This is just a small sample