Too good to be true? ISTA's GSQ-RCO 2-bit DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash scoring the same as the base model
英文标题：Too good to be true? ISTA's GSQ-RCO 2-bit DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash scoring the same as the base model
Has anyone tried ISTA's GSQ-RCO GGUFs for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash? Does the quality feel as good as their benchmarks show (IQ2_XXS matching the base)? Their benchmarks are saturated (90%+, and AIME25 is 100 for every version), so they probably can't show the degradation, and I couldn't find any KL
打开原文相关 2 · 机会 0
中文
Has anyone tried ISTA's GSQ-RCO GGUFs for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash? Does the quality feel as good as their benchmarks show (IQ2_XXS matching the base)? Their benchmarks are saturated (90%+, and AIME25 is 100 for every version), so they probably can't show the degradation, and I couldn't find any KL
中文全文翻译正在补齐，可先查看下方英文原文。
English / 原文
Has anyone tried ISTA's GSQ-RCO GGUFs for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash? Does the quality feel as good as their benchmarks show (IQ2_XXS matching the base)? Their benchmarks are saturated (90%+, and AIME25 is 100 for every version), so they probably can't show the degradation, and I couldn't find any KL