Grok 4.5

评测者认为，Grok 能力出色但表现不够稳定。一名用户称赞它在分析、写作、编程和解决问题等任务中的速度与覆盖范围，但表示其付费版本价格过高。另一名用户则强烈反对这一评价，认为它弱于 ChatGPT 和 DeepSeek，尤其是在聊天机器人质量和照片编辑方面，并指出其图像修改效果不佳、细节容易失真。来自 Agentplace 和 IFTTT 创始团队的反馈强调了其快速推理和实时知识能力，适合用于实时自动化，这表明它在技术工作流中的吸引力可能强于面向普通消费者的使用场景。

Reviewers see Grok as capable but uneven. One user praises its speed and range across analysis, writing, coding, and problem-solving, but says the paid tier is too expensive. Another sharply disagrees, calling it weaker than ChatGPT and DeepSeek, especially for chatbot quality and photo editing, citing poor image changes and distorted details. Founder feedback from the makers of

Agentplace

and

IFTTT

highlights fast reasoning and real-time knowledge for live automations, suggesting stronger appeal in technical workflows than in general consumer use.