OpenAI 伦理主管 Chloé Bakalar 为何离职?
英文标题:🔶 Why Did OpenAI's Head of Ethics Chloé Bakalar Leave?
Chloé Bakalar 已离开 OpenAI,此前她在公司主要关注模型开发的伦理方法、人类与 AI 的互动,以及机器意识相关讨论。知情人士称,她曾是 OpenAI 唯一的专职伦理学家,目前尚无继任者。OpenAI 表示,AI 伦理并不由单一负责人或团队承担,而是已深度嵌入多个研究团队推动的模型构建流程。她此前曾任 Meta 首席伦理学家,并继续在普林斯顿大学和伦敦大学学院担任相关学术及顾问职务。
10.6 KB
12.9 KB
932.3 KB
19.9 KB
20.2 KB
1.7 KB
2.5 KB
2.7 KB
8.8 KB
43.9 KB
中文
Chloé Bakalar 离开 OpenAI
一名了解其职责、并接受英国《金融时报》(FT)采访的人士表示,在 OpenAI,Chloé 的主要工作重点包括模型开发的伦理方法、人类如何与 AI 互动,以及围绕机器意识的讨论。
该人士告诉该报,她是公司唯一的专职伦理学家,目前没有继任者。
OpenAI 一名发言人向 FT 表示:“我们感谢 Chloé 作出的贡献。AI 伦理并不由 OpenAI 内某一位负责人或某一个团队单独负责;伦理考量已深度嵌入模型构建流程,并由研究部门的多个团队共同推动。”
在加入 OpenAI 之前——她于去年 8 月开始担任该职位——她曾于 2021 年 11 月至 2025 年 8 月担任 Meta 的首席伦理学家。
Chloé 目前还担任普林斯顿技术政策中心顾问委员会成员,以及伦敦大学学院高级研究助理。
她曾在天普大学、普林斯顿大学和宾夕法尼亚大学担任多项学术职务;她在宾夕法尼亚大学完成政治学与政府学博士学位。她的博士论文题为《Small Talk: The Socialities of Speech in Liberal Democratic Life》。
English / 原文
Chloé Bakalar departs OpenAI
At OpenAI, Chloé’s primary focus was on ethical approaches to model development, how humans interact with AI and debate over machine consciousness, said one person familiar with her role who spoke with the FT.
The person told the newspaper that she was the only dedicated ethicist at the company and there is no replacement.
“We’re thankful for Chloé’s contributions,” an OpenAI spokesperson told the FT. “AI ethics doesn’t live with one owner or team at OpenAI and ethical considerations are deeply embedded into the model-building process driven by a number of teams across research."
Before her role at OpenAI, which she started last August, she was the Chief Ethicist at Meta from November 2021 to August 2025.
Chloé also currently serves as an Advisory Council Member at the Princeton Center for Technology Policy and as a Senior Research Associate at University College London.
She has held a variety of academic positions at Temple University, Princeton, and the University of Pennsylvania – where she completed her PhD in Political Science and Government. Her Dissertation was titled “Small Talk: The Socialities of Speech in Liberal Democratic Life.”