I ran DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B + DSpark on one RTX PRO 6000. The drafter was faster in RAM than VRAM.
英文标题:I ran DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B + DSpark on one RTX PRO 6000. The drafter was faster in RAM than VRAM.
Hey guys, Just finished benchmarking DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B + DSpark on a single RTX PRO 6000 96GB. Short version: DSpark: ~15–17% faster generation on my coding workload On this setup, the DSpark drafter was faster in system RAM than VRAM q8_0 KV cache: 256K → 768K context with basically no decode
打开原文相关 2 · 机会 0
中文
Hey guys, Just finished benchmarking DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B + DSpark on a single RTX PRO 6000 96GB. Short version: DSpark: ~15–17% faster generation on my coding workload On this setup, the DSpark drafter was faster in system RAM than VRAM q8_0 KV cache: 256K → 768K context with basically no decode
中文全文翻译正在补齐,可先查看下方英文原文。
English / 原文
Hey guys, Just finished benchmarking DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B + DSpark on a single RTX PRO 6000 96GB. Short version: DSpark: ~15–17% faster generation on my coding workload On this setup, the DSpark drafter was faster in system RAM than VRAM q8_0 KV cache: 256K → 768K context with basically no decode