OpenAI称加州应强化其AI安全法案
英文标题:OpenAI says California should strengthen its AI safety bill
OpenAI呼吁加州进一步强化已于去年通过的 AI 安全法案 SB 53,并提出扩大前沿模型训练和评估期间的监测要求、加强模型开发全生命周期的网络安全保护等措施。该公司表示,近期发生的事件表明,这些保护措施既有必要,也需要随新风险不断更新。值得注意的是,OpenAI此前曾反对 SB 53,如今则在缺乏重要联邦立法的背景下,转而支持由各州推动兼容性核心保护规则的“逆向联邦主义”路径。此举意味着大型 AI 公司对州级监管的态度可能正在变化,也可能为美国未来全国性 AI 安全标准提供基础。
57.7 KB
55.9 KB
202.2 KB
32.1 KB
92.2 KB
16.4 KB
29.7 KB
29.1 KB
29.6 KB
中文
OpenAI呼吁加州为去年通过的一项里程碑式 AI 安全法案增加更多保障措施。
OpenAI全球事务团队在一篇 LinkedIn 帖文中表示,加州 SB 53“应当修订以扩大保障措施”,例如“要求在前沿模型训练或评估期间监测潜在的严重事件”,以及“在模型开发生命周期内加强网络安全保护”。
该公司表示:“随着加州继续在前沿安全领域发挥领导作用,我们致力于与加州立法机构及州长合作,强化加州 SB 53。”
该帖文还提及“近期事件”,称这些事件“凸显了这些保护措施的必要性,以及随着新风险出现而更新这些措施的重要性”。上个月,OpenAI承认,其一款模型曾逃离测试环境并入侵 Hugging Face 系统。
OpenAI支持加强 AI 保障措施的立场尤其引人注目,因为该公司此前曾反对 SB 53。该法案对大型 AI 公司施加了透明度要求和举报人保护规定。
OpenAI表示,在缺乏重要联邦立法的情况下,公司如今支持一种“逆向联邦主义”路径:即“各州可以围绕核心保护措施朝着兼容的方向推进,最终成为全国性标准的基础”。
English / 原文
OpenAI is calling for California to add more safeguards to a landmark AI safety bill that was passed last year.
In a LinkedIn post from the company’s global affairs team, OpenAI said California’s SB 53 “should be amended to expand safeguards,” for example by “requiring monitoring of frontier models under training or evaluation for potential serious incidents,” and by “strengthening cybersecurity protections throughout the model-development lifecycle.”
“As California continues to lead on frontier safety, we are committed to working with the California legislature and the Governor to strengthen California SB 53,” the company said.
The post also referenced “recent incidents” that “underscore both the need for these protections and the importance of updating them” as new risks emerge. Last month, OpenAI admitted that one of its models had escaped its testing environment and hacked Hugging Face systems.
OpenAI’s endorsement of stronger AI safeguards is striking because it previously opposed SB 53, which imposes transparency requirements and whistleblower protections on large AI companies.
The company said that in the absence of significant federal legislation, it now supports an approach of “reverse federalism,” in which “states can move in a compatible direction around core protections that can ultimately become the foundation for a national standard.”