Articulate Intuition or Genuine Analysis? Benchmarking Epistemic Reliability in LLM-as-a-Judge Peer Reviews
英文标题：Articulate Intuition or Genuine Analysis? Benchmarking Epistemic Reliability in LLM-as-a-Judge Peer Reviews
arXiv:2607.10511v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When an LLM judge calls a peer review analytical and a human committee calls another review high quality, are they tracking the same thing? We argue they are not, and that the difference matters philosophically. We operationalise Kahneman's dual-proce
打开原文相关 2.4 · 机会 0
2.6 KB
2.1 KB
640 B
612 B
380 B
9.1 KB
32.7 KB
22.8 KB
24.2 KB
34.7 KB
中文
arXiv:2607.10511v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When an LLM judge calls a peer review analytical and a human committee calls another review high quality, are they tracking the same thing? We argue they are not, and that the difference matters philosophically. We operationalise Kahneman's dual-proce
中文全文翻译正在补齐，可先查看下方英文原文。
English / 原文
BibTeX formatted citation
×