arXiv:2607.15647v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LEED v4.1 BD+C certification remains a document-intensive process that requires reviewers to read hundreds of pages of project evidence and apply credit-specific threshold logic by hand. This paper investigates whether small, locally deployed language

中文全文翻译正在补齐，可先查看下方英文原文。

[Submitted on 17 Jul 2026]

Title:Neuro-Symbolic AI for LEED compliance: Document-Centric Benchmarking, Deterministic Numeric Checking, and When Multimodal Hurts

View a PDF of the paper titled Neuro-Symbolic AI for LEED compliance: Document-Centric Benchmarking, Deterministic Numeric Checking, and When Multimodal Hurts, by Aritro De (1) and Juliana Felkner (1) ((1) The University of Texas at Austin)

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:LEED v4.1 BD+C certification remains a document-intensive process that requires reviewers to read hundreds of pages of project evidence and apply credit-specific threshold logic by hand. This paper investigates whether small, locally deployed language models can perform meaningful screening of LEED documentation and how deterministic symbolic components should share that work. A neuro-symbolic pipeline is introduced that aligns project PDFs to LEED credit sections, retrieves evidence with credit-aware keyword signatures, verifies compliance with a locally hosted 4-billion-parameter language model, and applies a LEED-specific numeric checker to quantitative thresholds. Experiments on four university buildings (484 PDFs, 153 credit-level decisions) show that a 4-billion-parameter model (gemma3:4b) is the strongest text-only core verifier, achieving 67.3% accuracy and outperforming a larger 8-billion-parameter model (llama3.1:8b) in this task. The deterministic numeric checker corrects arithmetic errors on key quantitative credits, moving EA-p2 from 50% to 100% accuracy and improving several other credits when required values are reliably extracted. At the same time, the full neuro-symbolic configuration achieves 61.6% overall accuracy, trailing the best text-only baseline due to extraction failures and conservative behavior on qualitative categories. Systematic ablations show that adding low-resolution drawing images (150-300 dpi) consistently reduces accuracy, and that prompt effectiveness depends on the building's ground-truth PASS rate: rubric prompts perform best on documentation-rich projects, while chain-of-thought prompts perform best on documentation-lean projects. Within the specific scope of LEED v4.1 BD+C compliance verification over raw project documentation, this pipeline and its baselines provide an initial reproducible reference point for both accuracy and failure modes.

Submission history

From: Aritro De [

view email

]

[v1]

Fri, 17 Jul 2026 05:45:02 UTC (1,511 KB)