论文研究 arXiv cs.CL Mon, 27 Jul 2026 正文 thin 4 words

Evaluation design conditions the expert-vs-auto MeSH gap: a controlled comparison of bag-of-words and BiomedBERT on the Cohen benchmark

英文标题:Evaluation design conditions the expert-vs-auto MeSH gap: a controlled comparison of bag-of-words and BiomedBERT on the Cohen benchmark

arXiv:2607.21685v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A systematic review begins with someone reading thousands of abstracts to identify the few that are relevant, and classifiers are used to prioritise that reading. Their inputs are often augmented with Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), assigned either b
打开原文相关 1.6 · 机会 1
media2.1 KB media612 B media380 B media9.1 KB media32.7 KB media22.8 KB media24.2 KB media34.7 KB

中文

arXiv:2607.21685v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A systematic review begins with someone reading thousands of abstracts to identify the few that are relevant, and classifiers are used to prioritise that reading. Their inputs are often augmented with Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), assigned either b

中文全文翻译正在补齐,可先查看下方英文原文。

English / 原文

BibTeX formatted citation

×