论文研究 arXiv cs.CL Mon, 27 Jul 2026 正文 ok 337 words

Ground Truth First: A Longitudinal Evaluation Instrument for Agent Memory, and the Tenure Crossover in Memory-Architecture Rankings

英文标题:Ground Truth First: A Longitudinal Evaluation Instrument for Agent Memory, and the Tenure Crossover in Memory-Architecture Rankings

arXiv:2607.21962v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Benchmarks for LLM-agent memory typically generate conversations first and extract answer keys afterwards -- with documented label-error and contamination problems -- and they overwhelmingly measure short interaction histories. We invert the pipeline:
打开原文相关 3.2 · 机会 1
media2.1 KB media612 B media380 B media9.1 KB media32.7 KB media22.8 KB media24.2 KB media34.7 KB

中文

arXiv:2607.21962v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Benchmarks for LLM-agent memory typically generate conversations first and extract answer keys afterwards -- with documented label-error and contamination problems -- and they overwhelmingly measure short interaction histories. We invert the pipeline:

中文全文翻译正在补齐,可先查看下方英文原文。

English / 原文

[Submitted on 24 Jul 2026]

Title:Ground Truth First: A Longitudinal Evaluation Instrument for Agent Memory, and the Tenure Crossover in Memory-Architecture Rankings

View a PDF of the paper titled Ground Truth First: A Longitudinal Evaluation Instrument for Agent Memory, and the Tenure Crossover in Memory-Architecture Rankings, by Quentin Spencer

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Benchmarks for LLM-agent memory typically generate conversations first and extract answer keys afterwards -- with documented label-error and contamination problems -- and they overwhelmingly measure short interaction histories. We invert the pipeline: a seeded life-script sampler emits facts with validity intervals, volatility classes, and source channels before any text exists; an LLM renderer writes chat and email from per-event fact manifests; a fidelity verifier confirms every planted fact; and questions are instantiated mechanically from the script, so gold answers are script-valid by construction and separately validated for answerability. The synthetic, fictionalized corpus (~380 questions, 15 types) embeds features absent from the benchmarks we survey: per-fact validity intervals, sent/received trust distinctions, injection probes in a benign harness, and as-of-date question sets. Benchmarking five memory architectures against a no-memory control (fixed answerer, versioned LLM judge, three replicates, two horizons), we find backend rankings invert with history length: the budgeted curated-map memory that leads at three weeks loses recall of evicted content by nine weeks (96% to 72%) while a provenance-typed graph rises to 90%; the inversion is positive for all six users under complete cross-family re-judging (exact p=0.031). A full-rendered-history baseline ties or exceeds the best memory system at the short horizon but shows no judge-independent advantage at nine weeks, at about twice the read cost. Write-stage quality strongly correlates with downstream quality (weakly-written facts fail 24% vs 2%), and injection resistance tracked whether provenance boundaries survive representation. A layered architecture performs best among the memory systems in both regimes (96.8% short-horizon) and is released as Veracium, an open-source library, with the corpus generator and harness.

Submission history

From: Quentin Spencer [

view email

]

[v1]

Fri, 24 Jul 2026 04:19:45 UTC (54 KB)