论文研究 arXiv cs.CV Mon, 24 Aug 2026 正文 ok 239 words

聚合,而非适配:面向跨站点帕金森步态严重程度的受试者级后验聚合与传导式校准

英文标题:Aggregate, Don't Adapt: Subject-Level Posterior Aggregation and Transductive Calibration for Cross-Site Parkinsonian Gait Severity

本文介绍了 MoCha 2026 帕金森步态基准与挑战赛的冠军方案:基于训练期间未见临床站点采集的规范化 SMPL 动作数据,预测 MDS-UPDRS 步态严重程度。该系统在隐藏测试集上取得 0.6945 的宏平均 F1,位列 58 个参赛方案第一,显著高于第二名的 0.5807 和主办方基线的 0.4289。作者指出,主要性能提升并非来自微调或更换编码器,而是来自复现基准分类头、受试者级步行后验平均,以及无标签传导式校准。研究还发现,其留出两个队列的交叉验证结果与最终隐藏测试得分呈负相关,提示跨站点评测中本地验证可能无法可靠反映真实泛化表现。
打开原文相关 1.6 · 机会 0
media2.1 KB media483 B media612 B media380 B media9.1 KB media32.7 KB media22.8 KB media24.2 KB media34.7 KB

中文

[提交于 2026 年 8 月 20 日]

标题:聚合,而非适配:面向跨站点帕金森步态严重程度的受试者级后验聚合与传导式校准

查看 Junlong Shen 撰写的论文《聚合,而非适配:面向跨站点帕金森步态严重程度的受试者级后验聚合与传导式校准》的 PDF。

查看 PDF

摘要:我们介绍了 MoCha 2026 帕金森步态基准与挑战赛的冠军参赛方案。该方案根据训练期间未见临床站点采集的规范化 SMPL 动作数据,预测 MDS-UPDRS 步态严重程度。系统在隐藏测试集上达到 0.6945 的宏平均 F1,在 58 个参赛方案中排名第一,高于得分为 0.5807 的第二名和得分为 0.4289 的主办方基线;其模型基于冻结的公开动作编码器,并仅使用单个 $4\times512$ 线性层。几乎全部领先优势都来自通常被视作事务性处理的三个阶段:精确复现参考基准的分类头配置;在主办方提供的受试者分组内,对每次步行的后验概率进行平均;以及针对特征均值和决策工作点进行无标签传导式校准。对编码器进行微调的四种不同形式均导致性能下降,另外十种替代编码器的表现也更差。由于每个消融实验结果都需要在隐藏测试集上付费获取,我们的全部消融数据均来自该测试集;而我们自己进行的“留出两个队列”交叉验证显示,在 11 种配置中,其结果与决定最终排名的分数呈负相关。我们完整呈现了这些负面结果,并指出我们最大的收益——受试者级聚合——构成了该基准上的性能上限约束。

提交历史

来自:JunLong Shen [

查看电子邮件

]

[v1]

2026 年 8 月 20 日,星期四,21:49:52 UTC(84 KB)

English / 原文

[Submitted on 20 Aug 2026]

Title:Aggregate, Don't Adapt: Subject-Level Posterior Aggregation and Transductive Calibration for Cross-Site Parkinsonian Gait Severity

View a PDF of the paper titled Aggregate, Don't Adapt: Subject-Level Posterior Aggregation and Transductive Calibration for Cross-Site Parkinsonian Gait Severity, by Junlong Shen

View PDF

Abstract:We describe the winning entry to the MoCha 2026 Benchmark and Challenge on Parkinsonian Gait, which predicts MDS-UPDRS gait severity from canonicalized SMPL motion recorded at clinical sites unseen during training. The system reaches 0.6945 macro-F1 on the hidden test and ranked first of 58 entries, ahead of the runner-up at 0.5807 and the organizers' baseline at 0.4289, on a frozen public motion encoder with a single $4\times512$ linear layer. Nearly all of the margin comes from three stages usually treated as bookkeeping: reproducing the reference benchmark's exact head recipe, averaging per-walk posteriors within the subject grouping the organizers ship, and a label-free transductive calibration of the feature mean and the decision operating point. Fine-tuning the encoder lost in four distinct forms, and ten alternative encoders were worse. Every ablation number is a paid read on the hidden test, because our own leave-two-cohort-out cross-validation proved anti-correlated with the deciding score over eleven configurations. We give the negative record in full, and identify our largest gain, subject-level aggregation, as the binding ceiling on this benchmark.

Submission history

From: JunLong Shen [

view email

]

[v1]

Thu, 20 Aug 2026 21:49:52 UTC (84 KB)